中文簡(jiǎn)介

100多年來(lái)，《植物病理學(xué)》一直被認(rèn)為是出版有關(guān)基礎(chǔ)研究文章的首要國(guó)際檔案期刊，這些文章增進(jìn)了對(duì)植物疾病的性質(zhì)、致病因素、傳播、造成的損失以及可用于控制這些疾病的措施的了解。范圍植物病理學(xué)發(fā)表關(guān)于基礎(chǔ)研究的文章，這些文章促進(jìn)了對(duì)植物疾病的性質(zhì)、致病因素、傳播、造成的損失以及可用于控制這些疾病的措施的理解。植物病理學(xué)認(rèn)為手稿涵蓋所有方面的植物病害包括細(xì)菌學(xué),開(kāi)始生物化學(xué)和細(xì)胞生物學(xué)、生物控制、疾病控制和害蟲(chóng)管理、新病原體的描述物種的描述新病原體物種,生態(tài)和人口生物學(xué)、流行病學(xué)、疾病病因、宿主遺傳和阻力,真菌學(xué),線蟲(chóng)學(xué),植物壓力和非生物障礙,采后病理和真菌毒素和病毒學(xué)。以分類(lèi)學(xué)為主要內(nèi)容的論文，如對(duì)新的植物病原菌類(lèi)群的描述，如包含植物病害的致病性、寄主范圍等研究成果，均可接受。分類(lèi)學(xué)論文的重點(diǎn)是分類(lèi)，鑒定和命名低于亞種水平也可以提交植物病理學(xué)。主題不是判斷植物病理學(xué)上發(fā)表的文章優(yōu)劣的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。然而，建立與植物病理學(xué)的相關(guān)性是作者的責(zé)任。將區(qū)分日常工作和重要工作。作者應(yīng)該在文章中清楚地說(shuō)明這項(xiàng)工作的意義。新穎性、創(chuàng)新性、清晰的寫(xiě)作和假設(shè)驅(qū)動(dòng)的研究是判斷植物病理學(xué)手稿的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。快速的編輯決策、接受后的出版速度以及全球讀者是向植物病理學(xué)提交手稿的額外原因。病原體種群生物學(xué)的研究應(yīng)該解決一個(gè)原始的問(wèn)題或假設(shè)。一般來(lái)說(shuō)，描述病原體多樣性或種群結(jié)構(gòu)的研究是不可接受的，除非它們還涉及一個(gè)生物學(xué)問(wèn)題，從而提高了我們對(duì)病原體種群生物學(xué)的概念知識(shí)。此外，在制定和描述適當(dāng)?shù)牟≡w取樣方案時(shí)，應(yīng)像在隨后采購(gòu)和分析標(biāo)記數(shù)據(jù)時(shí)一樣，給予足夠的重視。然而，在某些情況下，如對(duì)歷史上分離的標(biāo)本或被隔離的病原體進(jìn)行分析時(shí)，作者無(wú)法控制的抽樣缺陷是可以接受的。鼓勵(lì)發(fā)表基因組學(xué)和功能基因組學(xué)相關(guān)論文;然而，作者必須證明該研究如何處理上述植物病理學(xué)的中心重點(diǎn)。只報(bào)告完整或部分核苷酸序列(包括生物體基因組序列草案)的論文是不能發(fā)表的，除非它們將結(jié)構(gòu)與功能聯(lián)系起來(lái)，或者證明序列信息如何促進(jìn)我們對(duì)病原體生物學(xué)的理解。Methods-type標(biāo)記文件應(yīng)滿足下列標(biāo)準(zhǔn)之一:(i)的新技術(shù)或者修改的報(bào)告顯著增強(qiáng)當(dāng)前的技術(shù)或這些方法的應(yīng)用,或(ii)使用技術(shù)研究有趣的生物學(xué)問(wèn)題,有助于植物病理學(xué)的基本概念和理解。

投稿網(wǎng)址：http://apsjournals.apsnet.org/page/authorinformation

英文簡(jiǎn)介

For over 100 years Phytopathology has been considered the premier international archival journal for publication of articles on fundamental research that advances understanding of the nature of plant diseases, the agents that cause them, their spread, the losses they cause, and measures that can be used to control them.ScopePhytopathology publishes articles on fundamental research that advances understanding of the nature of plant diseases, the agents that cause them, their spread, the losses they cause, and measures that can be used to control them. Phytopathology considers manuscripts covering all aspects of plant diseases including bacteriology, host-parasite biochemistry and cell biology, biological control, disease control and pest management, description of new pathogen species description of new pathogen species, ecology and population biology, epidemiology, disease etiology, host genetics and resistance, mycology, nematology, plant stress and abiotic disorders, postharvest pathology and mycotoxins, and virology. Papers dealing mainly with taxonomy, such as descriptions of new plant pathogen taxa are acceptable if they include plant disease research results such as pathogenicity, host range, etc. Taxonomic papers that focus on classification, identification, and nomenclature below the subspecies level may also be submitted to Phytopathology. Subject matter is not a criterion for judging the merit of an article for publication in Phytopathology. However, it is the author’s duty to establish relevance to the science of plant pathology. Distinctions will be made between routine and significant. The author should clearly present the significance of the work in the article. Novelty, innovativeness, lucid writing, and hypothesis-driven research are the criteria for judging manuscripts in Phytopathology. Rapid editorial decision, speed of publication following acceptance, and a global audience are additional reasons to submit manuscripts to Phytopathology.Studies of pathogen population biology should address an original question or hypothesis. In general, studies that describe pathogen diversity or population structure are not acceptable unless they also address a biological question that advances our conceptual knowledge of pathogen population biology. In addition, as much care should be given to the development and description of an appropriate pathogen sampling scheme as is given to the subsequent procurement and analysis of marker data. However, sampling deficiencies beyond the control of the author will be acceptable in some cases, e.g., when conducting analyses of historical isolate collections or quarantined pathogens.Genomics and functional genomics-related papers are encouraged; however, authors must demonstrate how the research addresses the central emphases of Phytopathology described above. Papers that solely report complete or partial nucleotide se?quences including draft genome sequences of organisms are not acceptable for publication unless they relate structure to function or demonstrate how the sequence information may advance our understanding of the biology of the pathogen. Methods-type marker papers should meet one of the following criteria: (i) a report of new techniques or modifications that significantly enhances current techniques or the application of these methods, or (ii) the use of techniques to investigate interesting biological questions that contribute to the basic concepts and understanding of plant pathology.