中文簡(jiǎn)介

《俄羅斯生態(tài)學(xué)雜志》在理論生態(tài)學(xué)和實(shí)驗(yàn)生態(tài)學(xué)的所有分支上發(fā)表了完整的原始研究成果、綜述、關(guān)于當(dāng)前辯論主題的文章以及關(guān)于新研究方法的信息。同行評(píng)審《俄羅斯生態(tài)學(xué)雜志》是一份同行評(píng)議的期刊。我們使用單一的盲同行評(píng)審格式。我們的審稿人團(tuán)隊(duì)包括超過(guò)70名審稿人，包括內(nèi)部審稿人和外部審稿人(85%)。2017年從提交到首次評(píng)審的平均周期為30天，從首次評(píng)審到驗(yàn)收的平均周期為50天。2017年投稿退稿率為70%。接受發(fā)表的文章由總編作出最后決定。被邀請(qǐng)的審稿人因利益沖突，認(rèn)為不符合審稿條件或者不能審稿的，應(yīng)當(dāng)及時(shí)通知審稿人，并予以拒絕。審稿人應(yīng)以一種合理合理的方式清晰地闡述自己的觀點(diǎn)，這樣作者才能利用審稿人的觀點(diǎn)來(lái)完善稿件。必須避免對(duì)作者的個(gè)人批評(píng)。評(píng)論者應(yīng)該顯示發(fā)表的一篇評(píng)論(我)任何相關(guān)的工作沒(méi)有被引用的作者,(2)任何已報(bào)道在以前的出版物和沒(méi)有適當(dāng)?shù)膮⒖蓟蛞?(2)任何實(shí)質(zhì)性相似或重疊與其他手稿(發(fā)表或未發(fā)表)的個(gè)人知識(shí)。

投稿網(wǎng)址：https://www.springer.com/life+sciences/ecology/journal/11184

英文簡(jiǎn)介

The Russian Journal of Ecology publishes completed original studies in all branches of theoretical and experimental ecology, reviews, articles on topics currently in debate, and information on new methods of research.PEER REVIEWRussian Journal of Ecology is a peer reviewed journal. We use a single blind peer review format. Our team of reviewers includes over 70 reviewers, both internal and external (85%). The average period from submission to first decision in 2017 was 30 days, and that from first decision to acceptance was 50 days. The rejection rate for submitted manuscripts in 2017 was 70%. The final decision on the acceptance of an article for publication is made by the Editor-in-Chief.Any invited reviewer who feels unqualified or unable to review the manuscript due to the conflict of interests should promptly notify the editors and decline the invitation. Reviewers should formulate their statements clearly in a sound and reasoned way so that authors can use reviewer’s arguments to improve the manuscript. Personal criticism of the authors must be avoided. Reviewers should indicate in a review (i) any relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors, (ii) anything that has been reported in previous publications and not given appropriate reference or citation, (ii) any substantial similarity or overlap with any other manuscript (published or unpublished) of which they have personal knowledge.