sci論文被拒稿的情況也是較為常見的，但對于拒稿原因如若作者不認(rèn)同的話，那么就可以通過sci期刊公開的關(guān)于拒稿申訴的渠道進(jìn)行申訴。這時(shí)就需要通過寫申訴信來進(jìn)行申訴了，那么sci申訴信怎么寫呢?下面就為大家介紹一下并分享兩個(gè)申訴信寫作模板。

　　關(guān)于申訴信的寫作，一般雜志社會(huì)給出被拒稿原因，這時(shí)就算我們不認(rèn)同，也不要感情用事，先分析清楚雜志社給出的拒稿理由，如果確實(shí)不是文章存在什么大的問題，那么就可能是審稿人理解錯(cuò)誤，這時(shí)我們就可以直接走申訴通道進(jìn)行申訴。首先是需要作者向雜志社提交一份申述材料，注意禮貌用語，在信中逐條駁斥不認(rèn)同的被拒稿原因，說明詳細(xì)的理由，并列明具體資料或文獻(xiàn)依據(jù)。但是需要大家了解的是，sci申訴成功的概率并不太高，所以作者一定要是有足夠充分的理由足以反駁拒稿原因才行，不然只可能是浪費(fèi)時(shí)間。

　　另外sci申訴信的寫作，這里給大家整理了兩個(gè)申訴信模板，以供參考，如下：

　　SCI申訴信模板1：

　　Dear xxx,

　　Thanks for your letter in response to our previous submission of our manuscript (ABAB-3437). After having carefully read your letter, I feel little bit confused as your decision. The two reviewers and you previously suggested that our manuscript (ABAB-3437) could be accepted for publication should we be prepared to incorporate minor revisions. We had revised our manuscript carefully and complemented some experiments raised by the reviewers. The rejected decision of the Editorial Board might be because that we did not answer some of the reviewers’ comments clearly. We carefully considered the reviewers’ comments again and have further modified the manuscript according to your letters. In addition, we have consulted a professional language editing services to check the English.

　　We believe our manuscript (ABAB-3437) is potentially publishable for the following reasons.

　　First, this work presents interesting results on XXXXXXXXXX(省略……)

　　We understand that the misunderstanding might be caused by the unclear description in our manuscript, but we believe that the results are of merit and the paper is potentially publishable in the journal. Therefore, we would be most grateful if you could re-consider our work and give us a second opportunity. Thank you very much for your patience and understanding. Looking forward to hearing from you,

　　With best regards,

　　xxx and xxx

　　SCI申訴信模板2：

　　Dear Editor,

　　Thank you for your kind attention to consider our manuscript. We have not the slightest grudge against the rejection. However,the reviewer’s report is quite unconvincing and unfair, or, if we may say,somewhat irresponsible for our work. So, we have to give a rebuttal against the comments of the first and the only reviewer by accommodating the reviewer’s comments.

　　XXXX(針對審稿意見寫反駁理由)

　　In short, we could not accept the comments given by the reviewer #1, and we would be very grateful if the editor can justify our rebuttals and reconsider our manuscript.

　　Thank you very much for your patience and understanding.

　　Best regards,

　　Your Name

---

轉(zhuǎn)載請注明來自：http://www.jinnzone.com/jiqiaozhidao/75743.html